Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 6:57 pm
by Ranryu
Don't forget the trip back is the exact opposite.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:32 am
by Nomad
You did not actually jump ahead in time by 12 hours. It was still the same time, just a different time zone. LoL

However, they did experiment before byr having 2 plane fly around the world in opposite directions. They had chronometers that were in sync when they left , but were slightly different when they met again. When I say slight, It could have been in the millionths of a second, but still different.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:34 am
by Nomad
Anthentaur, you spoke of teleportation. I posted about it some time back: here--> http://speculativevision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=566

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:19 am
by dustbow
I travel through time all the time every second im making a time travel....

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:22 pm
by Chuffy
Let's face it, time travel is not possible. If it were we would have visitors from our future dropping in all the time, but we don't do we!
End of theory.

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:53 am
by Dragonfleet
Unless of course those time travellers decide to keep it a secret. :P I'm kinda over time travelling stories tbo unless of course it has some function in a fantasy work.

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:56 am
by Spiderkeg
I think time travel is possible. If anything, at least time viewing. I have two theories on why time travelers aren't "discovered" in our time.

1. There are much better places to visit than boring ol' us.
2. The Earth as we know it ends because of our stupidity before we have a chance to develop time travel... or more importantly... the time travel vacation business.

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:04 am
by Chuffy
Chuffy wrote:Let's face it, time travel is not possible. If it were we would have visitors from our future dropping in all the time, but we don't do we!
End of theory.

You know I had this very discussion with a friend some time ago. He said time travel could be possible. I pointed out my theory about no visitors from our future and he said that's because there is no future, only present and past. He reckoned we are living life as it happens so if we could time travel we could only go back, not forward as it hasn't happened yet.
So I said to him, Ok, lets say in 50 years time we did develop time travel and you sent yourself back 50 years to this exact point in time. You would walk in this room just as the current you is saying,"There is no future, only present & past," and yet there's you from the future standing right there.
He didn't get it. He still couldn't see what a silly notion he had.
Then again, it's not possible anyway so it's a moot point.

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:17 pm
by Spiderkeg
Well, nobody really knows for sure (without a doubt) that time travel doesn't exist... or does exist. It's a fun topic to debate, but nobody can give you the correct answer. Stephen Hawking, who is by far smarter than you or me, has changed his mind on the time travel topic for decades.

Chuffy wrote:You know I had this very discussion with a friend some time ago. He said time travel could be possible. I pointed out my theory about no visitors from our future and he said that's because there is no future, only present and past. He reckoned we are living life as it happens so if we could time travel we could only go back, not forward as it hasn't happened yet.
So I said to him, Ok, lets say in 50 years time we did develop time travel and you sent yourself back 50 years to this exact point in time. You would walk in this room just as the current you is saying,"There is no future, only present & past," and yet there's you from the future standing right there.
He didn't get it. He still couldn't see what a silly notion he had.
Then again, it's not possible anyway so it's a moot point.


There is one flaw in this reasoning. Nothing states that in 50 years, or in your friend's life time, that time travel will yet be possible. The reason your friend did not show himself could be that he's already dead. You never know, he could have died at any point from now until 50 years from now.

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:46 pm
by Chuffy
Spiderkeg wrote:
There is one flaw in this reasoning. Nothing states that in 50 years, or in your friend's life time, that time travel will yet be possible. The reason your friend did not show himself could be that he's already dead. You never know, he could have died at any point from now until 50 years from now.


No you miss the point. I wasn't asking him to come back there and then. I was merely pointing out that he was so certain that time travel into the future wasn't possible where as past may be. If he had returned to himself from the future as he was making this point it would fill his entire theory with holes.
Read over my second post again. It's not an easy point to make but I think it's reasonable clear.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:25 am
by Spiderkeg
No I got your initial point. I was merely speculating that one reason your friend didn't come back to his past self from a future that doesn't exist (according to him) might be because he's already dead in the future. This will both nullify his theory and yours, however the truth will never be known. Who is to say. To your point, how are you so sure that time travel isn't possible?

A bunch of scientists can claim time travel is impossible. This is all speculation still. None of them are God, and none of them know for sure. The whole debate on the theory is really an educated guess in the long run. Science has not advanced enough for anyone to know for sure.

I believe time travel is possible, because "not possible" removes all other options even conceivable by humans or non-humans. There is a huge galaxy outside the window, with a lot of options and possibilities. Claiming time travel isn't possible is like saying the Earth is the only M class planet in the entire universe possible of supporting life, and more importantly, sentient life.

Incidentally, there is no hostility in my posting.

Chuffy wrote:
Spiderkeg wrote:
There is one flaw in this reasoning. Nothing states that in 50 years, or in your friend's life time, that time travel will yet be possible. The reason your friend did not show himself could be that he's already dead. You never know, he could have died at any point from now until 50 years from now.


No you miss the point. I wasn't asking him to come back there and then. I was merely pointing out that he was so certain that time travel into the future wasn't possible where as past may be. If he had returned to himself from the future as he was making this point it would fill his entire theory with holes.
Read over my second post again. It's not an easy point to make but I think it's reasonable clear.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:40 am
by Chuffy
Good point, but I still say it's not possible because they're not visiting.