Page 7 of 12
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:22 pm
Welcome, Lou! Archaeology student, huh? That could certainly help in writing fantasy!
Um, I like people to introduce themselves in the Discussion. But yeah you can jump into a story if you'd like. Experiments is another Adventure you could easily join into, and it isn't as frquently updated as Merolder.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:34 pm
I'm not new, I've been here before but it was ages ago. I've managed to forget a lot of the details about the story in the meantime. I've jumped into the story with the least posts as I thought it would cause least inconveiniance. I'm adding in one new character, and my old character is just appearing for old time's sake.
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 11:22 pm
Archeology? I dig archeology! It's got all them vowels, man! I mean, far out! *grins*
Note: by the way, I spell it as you do, but the spell checker doesn't like that second 'a'... bloody spell check!
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:43 am
I have been known to spell it archaeolology.
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:18 am
As have I. I spell it that way every time I write or type it. That was how it was originally spelled, from everything I've read. I think that it's only recently that they changed the "official" spelling of the word to the less Greco-Roman appearing "Archeology". This new spelling, though, looks just strange to me...
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:50 pm
It's bound to confuse me! My spelling is dubious at the best of times. Are you into arch, Aldan?
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:59 pm
Maybe they were just tired of it's archaic appearance?
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 1:20 pm
I'm not so much into archaeology as I am into History. I got interested in history as a "real" story back in elementary school, and have continued on, reading things when I make the time. I know that archaeologists are some of the people that "make" history, in that they find items and then using their brains try to come up with reasons for the items. Correct? Incorrect? Doesn't matter, if they make the person a name. That doesn't mean that they're not trying to come up with a correct answer, but it's just that so often they have been wrong. Of course, they are usually right about things, so to an extent it balances out...
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:46 pm
Yes- new evidence is often proving old archaeological theories incorrect. A lot of archaeology is uncertain.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:07 pm
Yike, alot of gibberish to me, honestly i have no idea what the heck all that crap is, i'm not smart at all.
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:42 pm
I would agree But then on a few games I am pretty sure you can get the best of me.
Actually you are smart just not open to the obvious.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:08 pm